Controversial C-TIPS unit among Pittsburgh police squads transferred out of chief's office
Acting Chief Regina McDonald on Monday shifted more Pittsburgh police officers away from direct supervision by the chief's office, including a unit that former Chief Nate Harper began that drew criticism from officers and city officials.
McDonald ordered Harper's hand-picked investigation unit, known as C-TIPS, to be disbanded. Many of the detectives in the unit will join the narcotics and vice unit that Cmdr. Cheryl Doubt heads, according to an internal police memo.
Officers and city council members questioned the work of C-TIPS, or the Community Technical Investigative and Preparedness Section. Many of the unit's detectives had ties to Harper, whom Mayor Luke Ravenstahl ousted last month because of a federal investigation into police spending.
Police spokeswoman Diane Richard said the internal moves were at the chief's discretion.
McDonald has said she believes the chief is too busy to directly oversee specialized units. Last month, she shifted to an assistant chief the supervision of the personnel and finance office, one of several that appear to be focuses of the FBI investigation.
This week's transfers include members of the bomb squad to the special deployment division that Cmdr. Scott Schubert heads. The transfers include Sgt. Matthew Gauntner, one of Ravenstahl's bodyguards, to special deployment.
Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.