Turzai: House could get liquor privatization bill soon
HARRISBURG — The House Republican leader on Tuesday introduced Gov. Tom Corbett's full-scale liquor privatization plan and plans to push for a vote in two weeks.
Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, sponsored Corbett's plan to relieve the state of its liquor business. Turzai's spokesman, Stephen Miskin, said House Bill 790 is “the bill proposed by Gov. Corbett, word for word.”
Turzai told reporters it's headed for a vote in the House Liquor Committee on March 18 and a final House floor vote March 21 or April 8, though he expects lawmakers to make changes.
House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, criticized Turzai for pushing the bill without adequate public input.
“The more complicated his plan becomes, the faster he wants to vote on it with no committee hearings,” Dermody said. “That should be a big flashing sign that something is wrong. ... Leader Turzai is pushing for a vote on his liquor bill before almost any discussion takes place.”
Pennsylvania and Utah are the only states controlling wholesale and retail sales of liquor and wine. Corbett, a Shaler Republican, would get rid of 619 state stores and allow wine and beer sales in grocery stores, pharmacies and big box stores. Beer distributors buying “enhanced” licenses could sell liquor and wine.
Corbett contends his plan would garner $1 billion over four years, which would go to school districts as block grants. The plan addresses “consumer choice and convenience,” the governor says.
Turzai held three public hearings last year on a privatization bill he proposed. That bill was “dramatically different” from Corbett's proposal or a modified plan that some Republicans are considering, said Wendell W. Young IV, president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776, which represents state store clerks and opposes privatization.
Closing state stores and the fate of about 3,500 clerks hindered attempts to privatize Pennsylvania's system of selling wine and spirits, adopted when Prohibition ended in 1933. GOP governors Tom Ridge and Dick Thornburgh could not win legislative support for privatization.
Corbett's spokesman Kevin Harley called the union “one of the most powerful special interest groups” in the state.
House Liquor Committee Chairman John Taylor, R-Philadelphia, has circulated a potential alternative to Corbett's bill, though he hasn't formally introduced a bill or amendment. His hybrid plan would keep state stores open. Grocery stores could sell beer and wine, and beer distributors would have a shot at getting licenses to sell liquor and wine.
Matthew Brouillette, president of the Commonwealth Foundation, which supports Corbett's plan, said Taylor's proposal “falls short in providing what the citizens of Pennsylvania demand: convenience, choices, and limiting the (Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board) to its proper role as regulator.”
Privately run “mom and pop” stores would be forced to compete with taxpayer-funded, government-run stores, Brouillette said. The plan maintains the state's wholesale monopoly, he said.
Taylor has said he is trying to develop a plan that could win House approval.
“What I make of it is, Republicans are not all on the same side of the issue,” Young said.
“This is not an easy task, by any stretch of the imagination,” Harley said.
Turzai said he expects lawmakers to alter Corbett's plan, noting that it's commonplace for either chamber of the General Assembly to do so. He stopped short of saying he would oppose privatization legislation that keeps state stores open.
If state stores remained under a privatization plan, Turzai said private retailers eventually would put them out of business.
Any bill that emerges from the House would have an uncertain fate in the Senate. President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson County, has given privatization a cool reception and spoken in favor of “modernization” of state stores to increase revenue.
Brad Bumsted is state Capitol reporter for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Clues to Chief Justice John Roberts’ thinking on new ObamaCare case
- Pirates enter Plan B with Martin off market
- For Steelers, a fight to finish for playoff berth
- Starkey: No explaining Steelers, AFC North
- Allegheny County buck could prove to be state’s largest ever taken
- Islanders outwork Penguins to sweep back-to-back meetings
- Allegheny County adoption event joins 40 children with families
- Leak of grand jury information could cost Attorney General Kane
- House fire doused in Turtle Creek
- Mears savors success, credits legendary Lange for guidance, inspiration
- For Pitt men’s basketball team, trouble in paradise