Two municipalities pay Moon man $37,500 to settle lawsuit over mistaken arrest
Two municipalities agreed to pay a Moon man a total of $37,500 to settle his federal lawsuit over a mistaken arrest, a lawyer representing one of the municipalities said Friday.
Jason A. Cercone, 30, sued after two Coraopolis police officers arrested him on drug charges based on a Moon police detective's statement when they were actually seeking a man with a similar name in Beaver County.
Cercone sued Coraopolis, its police Chief Alan DeRusso and Officer Albert Marx as well as Moon and its police Detective Brian Buydasz.
Paul Krepps, one of the lawyers representing Coraopolis, said the borough agreed to pay Cercone $25,000 while Moon agreed to pay him $12,500 to settle the lawsuit.
James Ross, Cercone's attorney, declined comment. The attorney for Moon and the township's manager couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
The parties' joint motion to dismiss the case is still pending before U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.