Suspect spits blood in face of officer during South Side brawl
Officers working Pittsburgh's South Side Saturation Patrol broke up a bloody brawl early Saturday and said one of the combatants spit blood in the face of an officer.
Stephen James Howell, 25, of Brookline was released from Allegheny County Jail on a $5,000 bond on charges of aggravated harassment, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and public drunkenness stemming from a brawl in the 1400 block of East Carson Street shortly after 2 a.m. Saturday.
Authorities said they came upon a mob of about 25 people. Flailing his arms, Howell was covered in blood, and members of the crowd “were all attacking one another,” according to a police report. When Officer Zachary Shample ran to stop Howell, the man allegedly spat “a mouth full of blood into (his) face,” the report stated.
Shample kneeled on the street while two officers pursued the suspect, who began fleeing down East Carson Street.
At 13th Street, they said Howell refused to listen to commands to stop and tucked his right arm underneath his body to prevent cuffing.
Once police restrained him, paramedics took him to UPMC Mercy Hospital, Uptown, where he was treated and released. Police ordered a blood test to check for communicable diseases.
Carl Prine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7826 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.