ShareThis Page

Colin Abbott files document seeking to withdraw plea in Butler County homicides

| Monday, March 11, 2013, 12:06 p.m.
Colin Abbott, charged in the killing of his father, Kenneth Abbott, and stepmother, Celeste
Colin Abbott pleaded no contest in Butler County court on Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013, to two counts of third-degree murder in the killing of his father and stepmother. On Monday, March 11, 2013, he filed a handwritten motion to withdraw his plea. File photo

A New Jersey man imprisoned for the murders of his father and stepmother in Butler County had a change of heart about pleading no contest, but a legal expert says he's unlikely to succeed with a request for trial.

Colin Abbott, 42, of Randolph, N.J., on Monday filed a handwritten, five-page request with Common Pleas Court to withdraw his February plea in the 2011 murders in his parents' estate in Brady.

His lawyer, Wendy Williams, said she has been unable to visit Abbott since his transfer on Thursday to SCI Pittsburgh.

“I still represent him unless and until a judge signs an order taking me off the case,” said Williams, with whom Abbott had described disagreements.

Abbott claims in his motion, dated March 6, that he entered his plea under duress and believed he had 10 days to withdraw it.

Judge William Shaffer, who sentenced Abbot to 35 to 80 years in prison, scheduled a hearing on his request for May 18, his office said.

Abbott claimed that Williams told him that the judge would allow him only one day to decide about the no-contest plea and give him no time to talk with family, he said.

“Moments before the defendant was to be sentenced, the defendant acknowledged to his attorney that he was having second thoughts,” Abbott wrote.

Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger said his office had not received Abbott's motion and could not comment.

Eileen Whiting of Albion, N.Y., Celeste Abbott's sister, said the motion disappointed but did not surprise her.

“I don't think it will go anywhere. I am satisfied that he's off the street and will never do this to another family,” Whiting said. “This just goes along with the rest of his life that we've seen so far. He has trouble being truthful about anything. Why would you enter a plea and try to change it three weeks later?”

Abbott avoided a possible death sentence with his no-contest plea to two counts of third-degree murder on Feb. 26. Shaffer sentenced him on the next day.

Trying to withdraw a plea after sentencing is unusual, said Bruce Antkowiak, a former federal prosecutor who teaches law at St. Vincent College in Unity.

“As a general rule, it is very difficult for a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea after a sentence. He would have to allege a very serious defect in the proceedings. He is also asking to go to trial with a charge of first-degree mur der,” Antkowiak said.

Abbott faced the death penalty if he were convicted at trial.

With plea agreements, judges typically are clear and methodical about advising defendants of their rights, such as the right to go to trial and the maximum sentence, Antkowiak said. Questions from the judge would be on the record, he said.

“The first thing an appellate court would do would be to look at a transcript and see if there was any defect,” he said.

Prosecutors said Abbott killed Kenneth and Celeste Abbott in July 2011 and scattered their burned remains on their property. He killed the couple to hide thefts of large amounts of money and to make himself the estate's primary heir, prosecutors contended.

Abbott told relatives that his father and stepmother died in a traffic crash in New Jersey, according to court documents. When family members asked for details, police in New Jersey had no record of an accident.

Within days of the Abbotts' deaths, paperwork from Kenneth Abbott's safety deposit box surfaced, showing he had changed his will in 2010 to make Colin Abbott the sole beneficiary of the estate.

Because of the slayings, the Abbotts' estates remain unsettled.

Rick Wills is a staff writer for TribTotal Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.