FBI investigating another St. Patrick's Day weekend arrest by Pittsburgh police
The FBI is assessing another arrest of a St. Patrick's Day celebrant by a Pittsburgh police officer, an agency spokeswoman said Tuesday.
“It's standard procedure to look into any kind of potential federal violation,” spokeswoman Kelly Kochamba said.
Investigators are looking at the arrest of Edward Lojak, 28, of Fawn on March 16.
Lojak cracked a rib, broke his nose and received other injuries when police tackled him outside Whim Night Club in Station Square. Police charged him with disorderly conduct, public drunkenness, drug possession, obstructing officers, aggravated harassment by a prisoner and resisting arrest.
His preliminary hearing is scheduled for May 1. His attorney, Phil DiLucente, declined to comment on the FBI's interest.
The FBI also is reviewing the arrest of Mark Keyser Jr., 27, of Ross outside Claddagh Irish Pub in SouthSide Works.
That arrest, captured on a bystander's camera, showed Detective Frank Rende walking toward Keyser with his Taser unholstered. He stood next to Keyser, and Rende said he held his Taser to Keyser's neck but did not activate it. Keyser fell to the ground. Police later said the Taser wasn't fired.
The Office of Municipal Investigation is reviewing both arrests.
Keyser's preliminary hearing on charges of defiant trespass, disorderly conduct and public drunkenness was continued Tuesday until April 4.
Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8591 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.