Share This Page

South Hills convenience store owners accused of food stamp fraud

| Thursday, March 28, 2013, 1:36 p.m.

Authorities indicted a second South Hills convenience store owner for wire and food stamp fraud, according to federal court documents filed Thursday.

Emile Bizimungu, 31, of either Brentwood or Knoxville redeemed more than $40,000 in food stamps between September 2011 and July 2012 at his Dollar Grocery Center in Mount Oliver borough, but a “substantial portion” of the transactions were fraudulent, prosecutors say.

An indictment filed on Wednesday charged Samson Dweh, 30, of Whitehall of defrauding the program on a “substantial portion” of the more than $200,000 he redeemed in food stamps between August 2010 and July 2012 at his Mariama African Store in Carrick.

Both men paid customers 50 percent of the cash value of their food stamps, then redeemed them at full value and allowed customers to use food stamps to make credit account or loan payments, prosecutors say.

Dweh also allowed customers to buy items not covered under the food stamp program, prosecutors say.

There was no phone listing for either man, and no attorney was listed for either in court records.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or bbowling@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.