Pitt signs deal for engineering students with Chinese university
The University of Pittsburgh inked an agreement with Sichuan University in China to start a joint engineering program for undergraduate students and research, Pitt officials announced Monday morning.
Faculty from the two universities will staff the Sichuan University Pittsburgh Institute, in Sichuan, which expects to enroll its first 100 students in the fall of 2014.
Plans call for Sichuan University to invest nearly $40 million to erect and equip a building for the institute on its campus. The Chinese university will cover the institute's operating costs and faculty start-up costs, Pitt officials said.
Gerald D. Holder, dean of engineering at Pitt, predicted the institute will yield benefits for students and businesses.
“The large number of American companies that do work in China or sell products there will benefit from the intercultural education that the joint institute provides,” Holder said in a statement.
The agreement comes four months after Carnegie Mellon University announced a partnership with Sun Yat sen University in Guangzhou to staff a joint institute to provide graduate education in engineering. CMU spokeswoman Chriss Swaney said CMU will begin its first class at Sun Yat sen University this fall.
The two Pittsburgh schools are among five universities — including Duke, the University of Michigan and New York University — that signed large partnership agreements with universities in China.
The Sichuan agreement is the second Chinese deal in two years for Pitt. The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine signed an agreement to accept 25 to 45 biomedical researchers from Tsinghua University in Beijing every year for two years of training as visiting research scholars.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ejections, heated moments mark Pirates’ win over Reds
- New Steelers cornerback Boykin clarifies remarks about Eagles’ Kelly
- Making environmentalism divisive
- Zimbabwe alleges Murrysville doctor illegally killed lion
- Pirates notebook: Burnett says ‘surgery is not an option’
- Outdoors notices: Aug. 3, 2015
- Rossi: Looking at the next great Steeler
- French riot police push back migrants at Channel Tunnel
- Ability to clog the trenches crucial to Steelers defense
- Penguins not alone in top-heavy approach to salary cap
- After early criticism, Haley has Steelers offense poised to be even better