Share This Page

Squirrel Hill Tunnel work causing traffic back-ups

| Saturday, April 6, 2013, 3:36 p.m.

The Squirrel Hill Tunnel rehabilitiation project caused traffic delays Saturday on Interstate 376 and through Squirrel Hill, authorities said.

Traffic got so thick on Murray Avenue in Squirrel Hill, it took 15 minutes for Dominic Mineo, owner of Mineo's Pizza House on Murray Avenue, to travel four blocks to the bank.

“It's clogged,” Mineo said. “You watch the light change two or three times and you didn't move three or four car lengths.”

Mineo headed for the back streets — but many drivers seemed not to know how else to avoid the main arteries, he said.

Traffic seemed heavier along Braddock Avenue in front of D's Six Pax and Dogz in Regent Square, server Zach Persichetti said, but people seemed better prepared to handle the disruption than in the past.

“Overall, business hasn't changed,” Persichetti said. “People are accepting it. It's not a huge deal to get off in Squirrel Hill and go the back way.”

The outbound, or eastbound, tunnel is closed until 6 a.m. Monday. Traffic merges into a single lane that exits the parkway at the Squirrel Hill-Homestead exit. PennDOT cameras showed backups stretching several miles on Interstate 376.

Route 28 traffic also was heavy. Dispatchers said they believed motorists were using it as a detour for the tunnel closure.

Motorists use Forward, Beechwood, Forbes and South Braddock avenues for the daytime detour, replacing Beechwood with Murray Avenue at night.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.