Judge temporarily blocks enforcement of contraceptive drugs mandate for Cranberry company
A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked the government from imposing a health insurance mandate on a Cranberry company that claims the mandate violates the religious freedoms of its owners.
Seneca Hardwood Lumber Co. and two of its owners, Wayne L. Helper and Carrie E. Kolesar, claim the administration's mandate that they provide coverage for contraceptives and so-called morning-after contraceptive drugs violates their Catholic beliefs.
U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti ruled Friday that blocking government enforcement of the mandate is less harmful than requiring the company and its owners to comply with the mandate while they pursue their challenge in federal court.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins forwards struggle in loss to Avalanche
- Starkey: In defense of Mel Kiper Jr.
- Agent: Polamalu undecided whether to play in 2015
- Wolf’s Pa. budget plan seen as having almost no chance
- Angry fans cited in shortage of refs in Western Pennsylvania
- Mt. Lebanon deer-culling corrals sprayed with urine, repellant
- Ice jam wipes out McKeesport’s marina
- Pirates look to put more pressure on opposition with better baserunning
- Dermatologist led UPMC residency program
- 11 Ligonier Township residents rescued by boat from floodwaters
- Miami’s 67-63 victory further damages Pitt’s NCAA Tourney hopes