Judge dismisses activist's civil rights lawsuit
By Brian Bowling
Published: Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 4:48 p.m.
A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed the remaining defendants from a community activist's civil rights lawsuit against the city and county.
Adrienne Young, 56, of Garfield claimed that city police falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted her four times and that country probation officers used false information to keep her in jail and then on home confinement.
All of the charges police filed against Young were dropped or dismissed except for a traffic offense of passing in a no-passing zone.
U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon in March dismissed the city and police defendants, ruling that police had probable cause for the arrests. She ruled Tuesday that a prior agreement by Young to drop the county defendants from the lawsuit was an enforceable settlement.
Young, founder of Tree of Hope Inc., said she plans to appeal.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Maatta not a top rookie finalist
- Indictment alleges scheme defrauded government of $10 million
- Penguins insider: Malkin found confidence in Game 3
- Switch in pairings helps Penguins defensemen find groove in Game 3
- ‘Save Chatham’ protesters ordered to leave Shadyside campus
- State College restaurant plans new statue of Joe Paterno
- Kovacevic: No science to solving power play
- Highmark’s insurance profit falls 40%
- Duquesne teachers accept fact-finder recommendations for contract
- Husband to stand trial in Derry middle school teacher’s murder
- Alaska’s Iditarod Trail challenges Unity couple