Share This Page

Oakdale man's lawsuit claiming false arrest dismissed

| Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 7:33 p.m.

An Oakdale man convicted in state court can't claim in federal court that he was falsely arrested after his truck struck the entrance of a Peters dealership, U.S. District Judge Terrence McVerry ruled Tuesday.

McVerry dismissed a lawsuit by Robert E. Snatchko Jr., 54, who claimed Peters police and the owners of Vasko Dodge conspired to turn a simple accident into criminal charges. Police charged him with deliberately ramming the dealership because of a dispute over the roadside assistance plan on his new truck.

A Washington County judge on Jan. 29 convicted Snatchko of criminal mischief involving property damage and simple assault after a nonjury trial, according to court records.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.