Share This Page

Father, son on trial for stabbing man to death in North Side argument

| Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 5:15 p.m.

Michael Weismantle, cut with a meat cleaver during a scuffle with two men, laid across the front seat of an SUV while his friend drove him to get help.

Timothy O'Connor testified on Wednesday that Weismantle, 26, of Millvale was bleeding and unconscious by the time they arrived at the Zone 1 police station in the North Side.

Bryan Keith Osborne, 44, and Alex Keith Osborne, 21, a father and son from the California-Kirkbride neighborhood in the North Side, are charged with homicide and conspiracy in Weismantle's death on Sept. 8, 2011. Bryan Osborne also is charged with aggravated assault and a weapons violation. The Obsornes' trial before Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey A. Manning began Monday.

O'Connor, 41, of Millvale said others in the vehicle “kept yelling at (Weismantle), trying to wake him up” while he called 911.

Paramedics took Weismantle to Allegheny General Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

“The whole situation only took a couple of minutes but it seemed like hours,” O'Connor said.

Defense attorneys Patrick Thomassey and Randall McKinney said their clients acted in self-defense. They questioned why police found three knives at the scene although the witnesses initially told police they didn't see either of the Osbornes wielding more than one knife.

Police said the fight stemmed from an argument between Weismantle's sister and Bryan Osborne's daughter. After the girls fought, the Osbornes began arguing with Weismantle. Alex Osborne told police he stabbed Weismantle at least twice with a meat cleaver after Weismantle threw a glass bottle at him.

Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or abrandolph@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.