Coroner identifies men in Washington murder-suicide
Washington city police investigate a fatal shooting on South Main Street outside the Keystone Club early Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Photo by WPXI
Washington police are trying to determine what prompted a man to fatally shoot his friend before killing himself early Thursday.
Lt. Dan Stanek said Nathan Roman, 30, and Michael Marchines, 31, both of Washington, were friends for years.
“I'm not sure why it would lead up to an actual shooting,” Stanek said.
Roman and Marchines may have argued after leaving Hungry Jose's on South Main Street, Stanek said. A third friend who left before them turned around and saw that Roman had been shot, Stanek said. He and others called 911 about 2:25 a.m.
Doctors at Washington Hospital pronounced Roman dead from bullet wounds to the chest and abdomen at 3:30 a.m., Coroner Tim Warco said.
Police began tracking Marchines' cellphone and found him lying on the sidewalk at South Main and South streets, Stanek said. He died from a self-inflicted shot to the head, Warco said.
“At this point we're assuming that one shot the other,” Stanek said, adding that police would review surveillance video. “We're still trying to talk to people there that night.”
Margaret Harding is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.