Poll: Most people think Pittsburgh Marathon will be safe
By Brad Bumsted and David Conti
Published: Friday, April 26, 2013, 11:00 a.m.
HARRISBURG — The fatal Boston Marathon bombings will not scare people away from running in Pittsburgh next week, a poll released Friday shows.
About 88 percent of voters say if they planned to run in the Dick's Sporting Goods Pittsburgh Marathon they would still do so, despite the April 15 bombings that killed three people and injured more than 250, according to a survey by Quinnipiac University.
“The runners may be even more positive about this now,” said Meyer “Skip” Grinberg, president of the Pittsburgh Marathon. “They've said they're not going to let the marathon be disrupted.”
The poll found 11 percent of voters would not take part because of the violence in Boston. By an 89- to 5-percent margin, Pennsylvania voters say they believe the Pittsburgh marathon on May 5 will be safe.
The poll of 1,235 registered voters, conducted April 19-24, has a margin of error of 2.8 percentage points.
Grinberg said he was aware of only one person who called the marathon to ask about dropping out because of concerns about the bombings. About 27,000 people registered for the full and half marathon.
Pittsburgh leaders and marathon organizers this week said they would increase security on the route, with new guidelines for runners and spectators at the Downtown start and finish lines. More police and private guards will protect the route, search bags and keep runners and spectators separate.
Statewide, 36 percent of Pennsylvania voters say they are “very worried” or “somewhat worried” that a family member could become a victim of a terrorist attack. The poll found 64 percent are “not too worried” or “not worried at all.”
About 45 percent of women are “very” or “somewhat worried,” compared to 27 percent of men.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kovacevic: Still waiting on Crosby, Malkin
- Rossi: Lack of together time showing for Penguins’ defense
- Police fatally shoot man in Wilkinsburg after chase
- 3 ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Washington County crash causes chemical spill into Chartiers Creek
- Fleury a bright spot among struggling Penguins in playoffs
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success
- LaBar: Did WWE referee know finish to Undertaker match?
- Attorney wants lesser term for woman in Greensburg torture death
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding