UPMC asks judge to dismiss city's lawsuit challenging its tax-exempt status
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, April 26, 2013, 3:27 p.m.
UPMC on Friday asked a federal judge to dismiss the city's lawsuit challenging its tax-exempt status for the same reasons the medical system originally moved the lawsuit from Allegheny County Common Pleas.
The city claims in the lawsuit filed last month that UPMC doesn't qualify under state law as a “purely public charity” exempt from the city's payroll tax.
UPMC had the case removed to federal court last week on the grounds that it involves questions on the medical system's tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code and the state criteria violated the Constitution's commerce clause.
While UPMC's motion to remove the case to federal court was automatically granted, the city can challenge the motion and seek to have it remanded to state court.
E.J. Strassburger, one of the lawyers representing the city, said the city plans to do that soon because the lawsuit is only making claims under state law.
“We are going to move to send the case back to common pleas, where it belongs,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Three ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Egg decorating turns to fight, charges in Brookline, police say
- Cool chemistry: Programs at Springdale library take inspiration from late science professor
- Choral concerts planned in Dawson church
- Plum man revels in Keystone hall of fame induction
- Six NA students finalists in Musical Kids competition
- Bridge work planned for Route 68 in Brady’s Bend
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets
- Study to target pool use at Belmont Complex