Police seek answers in fatal Butler County bus-train crash
At least two people remained hospitalized on Monday with injuries from a fatal crash between a bus and freight train in Butler County, authorities said.
“We still have a lot of questions,” said Evans City police Chief Joseph McCombs, whose department is investigating the crash.
An Allegheny Valley Railroad train traveling about 25 mph broadsided a 12-seat bus carrying elderly and disabled passengers on Friday morning at a crossing along Maple Avenue in Evans City.
Bus passenger Claudette Miller, 91, of Callery, Butler County, died in the wreck. Ten other people were taken to area hospitals.
Passenger John Burkett, no age or address available, remained in serious condition at Allegheny General Hospital in the North Side, a spokeswoman said. An unidentified male passenger remained hospitalized at Oakland's UPMC Presbyterian, but his condition was unavailable, a spokesman said.
Details of the accident remain unclear. The train's crew said the bus driver, Frank Schaffner, 59, paused on the tracks as the train approached. Alliance for Nonprofit Resources Executive Director Michael Robb said investigators told him the bus stopped at the tracks and then tried to go across them and that heavy fog played a role. The nonprofit operates the bus service.
McCombs said an investigation continues. Federal Railroad Administration spokesman Mike England said the agency is investigating.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.