Tree trimmings spark fire in Mt. Washington
Firefighters prepare to check for hot spots on Tuesday, April 30, 2013, after dousing a blaze on Estella Avenue in Mt. Washington.
Photo by Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Tree trimmings that fell on power lines sparked a fire on Tuesday that heavily damaged two houses in Mt. Washington, an arson investigator said.
Fred's Tree & Lawn Service workers were trimming tree branches when one fell on two power lines in the 100 block of Estella Avenue, causing the lines to touch and sparking an electrical arc, said Sgt. Rich Begenwald, a Pittsburgh police arson investigator.
No injuries were reported.
The lines sent an electrical charge to a house across the street and started a fire in a basement electrical panel, Begenwald said.
The three-alarm fire spread to a house next door when it vented from a basement window, city fire Chief Darryl Jones said.
Michael Bryant, 43, his wife, Sonja, 41, and their 10-year-old daughter live in the house where the fire started, but they were not home at the time, Michael Bryant said as he watched firefighters spray water into his house.
The Bryants' son, Dontae Williams, 25, who lives in Penn Hills, was in their home when the fire started, they said.
“He said he was in the shower and saw some lights flickering and heard banging,” Sonja Bryant said.
A Fred's Tree & Lawn Service employee pounded on the family's front door and warned Williams about the fire, Williams said.
Employees of the lawn service who were at the scene declined to comment, as did a woman who answered the phone at the South Park-based company.
The fire was reported at 12:39 p.m. Firefighters had it under control at 1:19 p.m., Jones said.
Both damaged homes are insured, Begenwald said. Begenwald said no criminal charges will be filed.
Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.