Appellate court affirms ruling on legality of Pittsburgh billboard ordinance
By Bob Bauder
Published: Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 7:30 p.m.
Pittsburgh City Council properly created an ordinance regulating electronic billboards, a state appellate court ruled on Tuesday.
Lamar Advertising, the nation's largest outdoor advertiser, sued in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court last year contending that revisions to the city ordinance should have been referred to the Planning Commission before council could adopt the changes. In addition to where billboards are located, the ordinance regulates their brightness and how often their screens can change.
Common Pleas Judge Dan Pellegrini ruled that the city properly enacted the ordinance, and Lamar appealed to Commonwealth Court. Downtown attorney Johnathan Kamin, who represented Lamar, said the company would consider appealing.
“We're disappointed with the decision of the court, particularly in light of the fact that we don't believe the city followed its own rules and regulations, and we'll review our options on how to proceed,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers defense’s rapid decline looks similar to that of Steel Curtain’s
- Starkey: NHL stuck in stone age
- Steelers notebook: Roethlisberger comes to Haley defense again
- PNC plans to do away with tellers
- Pirates general manager Huntington is searching for right player, deal
- Penguins’ Neal apologizes, vows to be better
- Help on deck to help Jeannette deal with Monsour, nearby buildings
- Woodley says he’s fine with move to right side despite numbers
- Pirates notebook: Polanco ruled out as Opening Day option
- Likely $2.3B influx puts PennDOT big-ticket road projects in play
- Pa. Lottery’s new Penny not so lucky after all