ShareThis Page

Tom Ridge says Obama erred in not treating bombing suspect as enemy combatant

| Thursday, May 2, 2013, 1:51 p.m.
Deb Deasy | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Ben Herr, 88, of The Arbors in Valencia, was a survivor of the Omaha Beach landing in Normandy, France, during World War II. Tom Ridge took some time to speak to him at Founder's Day on Thursday, May 2, 2013.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
'We’re naive to think that everybody within our borders embraces and loves this country,' said former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge said after a ceremony in his honor at St. Barnabas Charities Founders’ Day celebration in Richland on Thursday, May 2, 2013.

As the dust settles on Boylston Street, where two bombs tore through the home stretch of the Boston Marathon, one of the most vexing questions might be the most dismal:

Why did it take so long?

Nearly 13 years after al-Qaida hijackers dragged their global battlefield onto the American homeland, the kind of less sophisticated, homegrown attacks that have terrorized countries such as Israel for decades rarely occur here. Boston, terrorism experts worry, could be the start of something new.

“We're naive to think that everybody within our borders embraces and loves this country,” former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said on Thursday. “This is the kind of terrorism that has affected many countries and many communities around the world for decades, but it's the first time we've seen it to its horrible conclusion here.”

Authorities blame the bombing on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, who grew up in the United States, and his older brother, Tamerlan, who died in a firefight with police.

“This is what keeps (counterterrorism agents) awake at night: Why haven't we seen more of this?” said Michael Kenney, a terrorism expert and professor of international affairs at the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public and International Affairs. “The simple answer is I don't think we really know.”

Ridge, who left the Pennsylvania governor's office in 2002 to become the first director of Homeland Security, said the country's leaders need to establish a legal framework to prosecute terrorists outside of the civilian criminal justice system.

Ridge disagreed with President Obama's call to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, saying the prison is not the problem.

It's “not location; it's adjudication,” said Ridge, who received St. Barnabas Charities' Hance Award during a ceremony in Cranberry.

The country needs a judicial system that allows for classified information to be presented in judges' chambers, out of public view, but also provides public inspection for other portions of a trial. How that should be split, however, Ridge does not know.

He said he's still struggling with how to treat accused terrorists who, like Tsarnaev, are U.S. citizens entitled to constitutional protection.

But he disagrees with the Obama administration's decision to try Tsarnaev in civilian court and to read him the Miranda warning. Tsarnaev stopped talking to FBI agents after they read him the warning, 16 hours into the interrogation, The Associated Press reported.

Ridge, a former assistant district attorney, said authorities should have enough evidence to convict Tsarnaev, even if his statements are inadmissible because they did not read him his rights before questioning.

Those who support using the judicial system, however, note the successful prosecution of terrorists such as Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, who was executed in 2001, to the failed bombers of Times Square and a Detroit-bound airplane.

“Our legal system has been dealing with terrorists, politically motivated criminals, for decades,” Kenney said. “This is not new.”

If Boston-style attacks become more prevalent, the United States needs a better way to distinguish actual acts of terrorism from other mass killings — which the Boston attacks might turn out to be, said Charles Blair, senior fellow for state and non-state threats at the Federation of American Scientists.

The term “terrorist” “should only be used in the most extreme sense,” he said.

On the idea of trying Tsarnaev by military tribunal, Blair said: “We wouldn't have done that to the Columbine shooters, had they lived. We haven't done that to the Aurora (Colorado movie theater) shooting.”

Typical acts of violence have two parts: a perpetrator and a victim. Terrorism adds a third component: an audience that the perpetrator wants to frighten, Blair said. The Tsarnaev brothers did not state political goals, he said.

Illustrating the difficulty of this fight, Blair said Tsarnaev's tactics might align with terrorists, “but it doesn't mean it's terrorism.”

Mike Wereschagin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7900 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.