Share This Page

Court rules judge violated West End man's right to an attorney

| Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 6:00 p.m.

A West End man will get a new sentencing hearing because an Allegheny County judge violated his right to have an attorney, a Superior Court panel ruled Wednesday.

An Allegheny County jury found Bruce Smith, 23, guilty of criminal conspiracy, fleeing and eluding a police officer and three counts of endangering another person and an accident involving damage to an unattended vehicle for his role as a passenger in a car from which other passengers fired multiple gunshots, striking a man and a woman. He was sentenced to 17-34 years in prison.

During his sentencing hearing before Common Pleas Judge Donald E. Machen on Sept. 27, 2011, Smith told Machen that he no longer wanted to be represented by his court-appointed lawyer. The judge told him: “Well, we all have problems every day of the week, so suck it up.”

Superior Court Judge David N. Wecht reminded Machen in his opinion that the code of judicial conduct requires judges to be “patient, dignified and courteous,” and requesting to have a new lawyer is a Constitutional right.

Smith's new sentencing date has not been set.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.