Accusations, threats fly at Monroeville council meeting
A fight nearly broke out in the lobby of the Monroeville municipal building where council met Thursday night, when council candidate Paul Caliari confronted a resident whom Caliari and some Monroeville officials have accused of stirring the political pot.
“You've got a mouth,” Caliari said to John Yakim. “And I will bust your mouth.”
Monroeville Police Chief Steve Pascarella, who was in the lobby at the time, ended the argument.
Caliari and another council candidate accused Yakim of posting a photo of Caliari and his children on a campaign website that supports Caliari's opponent. Yakim denied posting the photo.
During the meeting, Monroeville Mayor Greg Erosenko and Councilman Steve Duncan leveled accusations of obscene behavior at a recent executive session against Councilwoman Lois Drumheller.
Erosenko said Drumheller was swearing at other council members, and physically blocked the doorway to prohibit certain members of council from leaving the room.
Drumheller denied the accusation.
“You don't have an idea what I did, because you walked out of that room,” she said.
“Yeah, because you were swearing like a trooper,” Erosenko replied.
Monroeville Solicitor Bruce Dice interjected at one point during the meeting, saying that when he attends municipal meetings elsewhere, one of the first questions is, “What's going on in Monroeville?”
A federal investigation into the municipality's emergency dispatch computer system is ongoing. An attorney hired by the municipality last month warned residents that people who called Monroeville's dispatch center with emergencies in recent months should check their bank accounts and credit reports for possible tampering.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.