State caseworker accused of bribing for sex favors
A caseworker at the state Department of Public Welfare's McKeesport office was arrested on Friday on charges of bribery and promoting prostitution after being accused of offering extra monetary benefits to women in exchange for sexual favors.
John Patrick Geary, 41, of North Versailles, who was awaiting arraignment in Night Court, is a 10-year veteran of the Welfare Department and has worked in the McKeesport office for five years, a criminal complaint states.
Although the charges were filed after one woman went to police, she told detectives that Geary boasted that he has “helped” others in desperate financial situations, the complaint states.
“I help girls out who help me out,” Geary told the woman, the complaint states. He also said it would be worth her time to “hang out” with him, the complaint states.
According to the complaint, the woman told detectives:
Geary told the woman that he usually hangs out with girls who bring drugs to party with him. He also told her that he invites women to his home because his wife works nights and his children sleep on the second floor.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.