Fire erupts in Beaver County Airport hangar
A leased hangar at the Beaver County Airport was damaged by a fire overnight on Tuesday, May 14, 2013. At least 10 fire companies responded to the blaze, which started about 2:50 a.m.
Photo by Keith Hodan | Tribune-Review
A fire on Tuesday morning heavily damaged a hangar at the Beaver County Airport in Chippewa.
Airport manager Beth LaValle said a firewall stopped the flames from spreading from one half of the hangar to the other, saving two planes and several cars stored inside.
The building, with a metal exterior and a wood frame, was too dangerous to enter, so a cause of the fire hadn't been determined, said state police fire Marshal David Jungling. He put losses, including computers and a flight simulator, in excess of $100,000.
The fire did not affect airport operations, LaValle said. About 165 flights a day are scheduled at the airport, according to Federal Aviation Administration records.
No injuries were reported.
The first reports of the fire came in about 2:50 a.m. from a Beaver County deputy sheriff who was patrolling the area, according to Beaver County emergency dispatchers.
More than eight fire companies brought the fire under control after several hours. Tankers had to be brought in to supplement hydrants because firefighters needed more water to douse the fire, authorities said. Operations wrapped up around 10:30 a.m.
The fire heavily damaged offices, including those for ACES Aviation, which provides flight instruction at the Community College of Beaver County. A statement on the company's web site said the offices are closed because of the fire. Company officials did not return messages.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.