Share This Page

Man claims in federal lawsuit that four city officers beat him up in South Side bar

| Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 3:06 p.m.

A Beaver County man claims in a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday that four Pittsburgh police officers beat him up during a May 26 incident on the South Side.

William Everetts, 22, of Hanover claims in the lawsuit that when he tried to enter the Local Bar + Kitchen while holding a beer he got into a fight with officer Andrew Miller and John Doleno, a bar employee.

Officers Stephen Matakovich, Stanley Comans and Mark Rush participated in the ensuing struggle, and while Everetts was face down on the ground the officers punched him in the face, kicked and kneed him, the lawsuit says.

Everetts subsequently pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct. He is suing SSLBK LLC, the company that owns the bar, Doleno, the city and the four officers. Adam DeSimone, the bar's owner, said he was unaware of the lawsuit and declined comment.

Everetts' lawyer, Gianni Floro couldn't be reached for comment. City Solicitor Dan Regan said the city is reviewing the lawsuit but has no reason to believe its officers didn't handle the situation as well-trained officers or that there's any problem with the city's policies.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.