Share This Page

Former mayoral candidate Richardson files appeal to get his driver's license back

| Thursday, May 30, 2013, 5:36 p.m.

Former Pittsburgh mayoral candidate A.J. Richardson on Thursday filed an appeal to get his driver's license back, court records show.

Pittsburgh police took Richardson, 36, of Sheraden into custody about 3 a.m. on April 3 after they found him slumped over the steering wheel of his green minivan along Steuben Street in the West End.

Richardson, who was released without bond, initially denied he was drunk but has since said he plans to plead guilty. His formal arraignment on charges of driving under the influence and driving an unregistered vehicle is scheduled for July 10. Neither Richardson nor his attorney, Cory Ricci, could be reached for comment.

Police said Richardson refused to take tests to determine his blood alcohol content, which in Pennsylvania results in a mandatory one-year license suspension.

A hearing on his driver's license suspension appeal is scheduled for Aug. 22.

Richardson, a community activist and bus monitor, received 294 votes – less than one percent – in last week's Democratic primary election, according to the county Elections Division.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.