Parkway East traffic not as bad as expected
Traffic is backed up on the Parkway East inbound on Saturday, June 1, 2013, because of the closure of one side of the Squirrel Hill Tunnel.
Photo by Heidi Murrin | Tribune-Review
Traffic backups on the Parkway East turned out to be shorter than expected on Saturday, despite the Squirrel Hill Tunnel's closure on a night when the Penguins and Pirates drew tens of thousands of people into the city, a PennDOT spokesman said.
At 7 p.m., the inbound traffic jam did not reach Wilkinsburg, PennDOT spokesman Steve Cowan said. Driving the detour route in midafternoon took about an hour, he noted.
“I think a lot of people either went into Pittsburgh early or took alternate routes knowing that the Squirrel Hill Tunnel was closed,” he said.
Melissa Nadeau, 38, drove from Monroeville with her husband, Ken, 36, and son Hayden, 6, to watch the Penguins game on the big screen outside the Consol Energy Center. They arrived at 3:30 p.m. and said they had to slog through traffic but had planned on the backup.
“It's Pittsburgh,” she said.
State police said they did not receive any complaints from motorists.
The $49.5 million repair project has closed the inbound tunnel lanes from 9 p.m. Friday until 5 a.m. Monday. Workers are replacing concrete slabs in a 100-foot section of the tunnel.
Mike Wereschagin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7900 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.