Pittsburgh's Cool Roofs program aims to reduce heating, cooling costs
Pittsburgh officials hope to save more than $2,000 this year by coating the roofs of 10 city-owned buildings with a reflective paint that will keep the buildings cooler.
Mayor Luke Ravenstahl on Wednesday announced the city's “Cool Roofs” program could lower average electricity costs by 10 to 15 percent each month, and reduce the city's carbon dioxide emissions by 50 tons.
“Cool Roofs is another volunteer-fueled step forward in our efforts to make Pittsburgh a greener, more sustainable city,” Ravenstahl said during a kickoff event at the Engine 27 fire station in Mt. Washington.
Through the servePGH program, volunteers will coat about 50,000 square feet of roofs of 10 buildings, including fire stations, with white paint that will reflect the sun's rays. Dark roofs typically absorb sunlight and generate heat, which in turn lead to higher costs to cool the buildings.
The paint will help roofs and air conditioning units last longer and reduce the heat-island effect in which roads and buildings make urban areas hotter than rural ones. A $56,000 grant from the Cities of Service Impact Volunteering Fund will pay for the paint and tools.
Mayoral spokeswoman Marissa Doyle said the city received $100,000 from the service impact fund. The remainder will establish 10 gardens in the city.
Organizations interested in volunteering to help paint roofs in groups of 10 to 20 can call servePGH at 412-255-2280 or email firstname.lastname@example.org. Volunteers must be 18 or older.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Syrian border town emerges as pivot point in Islamic State fight
- Experience ‘Faces and Voices’
- Penn State succumbs to No. 13 Ohio State in double overtime
- Pirates must weigh risk, reward in attempt to sign Martin
- CDC’s misinformation spreads faster than Ebola virus
- Penguins rebound with shutout of Predators
- Penguins’ Crosby OK with Neal comments about trade
- Starkey: Chryst missed his only shot
- Steelers notebook: Ex-Steeler Sanders living up to his word
- Pittsburgh Mills mall stability questioned
- Mini goes mainstream