Steelers, SEA disagree over who should pay for 3,000 additional seats at Heinz Field
By Adam Brandolph
Published: Thursday, June 13, 2013, 1:39 p.m.
Attorneys for the Pittsburgh Steelers and the city-county Sports & Exhibition Authority disagreed Thursday over which entity is responsible for paying for 3,000 additional seats at Heinz Field.
Their arguments before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Joseph M. James hinged on two paragraphs in the team's lease of Heinz Field from the SEA that talk about capital improvements.
Steelers attorney Arthur H. Stroyd Jr. said the seating upgrade to the south end of the North Shore stadium should be considered a capital improvement, and the SEA should be forced to pay two-thirds of the cost, or roughly $20 million. Heinz Field ranks 25th out of 31 NFL stadiums in terms of seating capacity.
Walter DeForest, an attorney representing the SEA, contended the upgrade is a “modification” of the stadium and does not meet the lease's definition of a capital improvement. The SEA wants the Steelers to foot the entire cost of the upgrades.
James — a Steelers season ticket holder — said he would rule on the issue within a week. He set a tentative trial date for Dec. 4.
The seating issue is part of a larger disagreement over upgrades at the 12-year-old stadium. The Steelers also want to add a scoreboard to the north end zone and be repaid for refurbishing its audio-visual control room. The total cost of the upgrades has been estimated at about $40 million.
The Steelers filed the lawsuit against the SEA after a deal to finance the addition fell apart. A proposed agreement would have paid for the expansion by charging fans an extra dollar to buy a ticket to the game and adding $2 to $3 dollars to the cost to park around Heinz Field during home games.
Stroyd called the SEA's position a “smokescreen” because it does not have enough money in a capital reserve fund to pay for the upgrades.
“I don't make a smokescreen argument,” DeForest said after the hearing. “Our argument is based upon the language of the lease.”
Mary Conturo, executive director of the SEA, said the organization has $4 million in its capital reserve fund. She declined further comment.
Mark Hart, director of planning and development for the Steelers, said the hearing was an important step to make sure the SEA lives up to its obligations.
“The expansion of Heinz Field will allow an opportunity for more Steelers fans to attend games. It is unfortunate that it has come to this after negotiating with the SEA for months,” Hart said. “If this matter is not resolved in the near future, another year of increased fan attendance and increased tax revenue will be lost.”
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success
- Boxer ‘Hurricane’ Carter, famously wrongly convicted, dies at 76
- Miss America asks York school to rethink prom question suspension
- Penguins’ Gibbons scores twice but leaves with apparent injury
- Biertempfel: Kendall’s book offers inside look at life in majors
- More women seize opportunities to start businesses
- Officials identify Chartiers shooting victim as Wilkinsburg man
- NFL notebook: Pryor will be cut if he’s not traded