Share This Page

Former East Washington police chief will spend 11 years, 3 months in prison for role in drug sting

| Friday, June 14, 2013, 12:45 p.m.

A former East Washington police chief who pleaded guilty to corruption charges will spend 11 years and 3 months in prison because he persuaded another man to commit a drive-by shooting, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

Donald Solomon, 57, pleaded guilty in January to providing protection and weapons to undercover federal agents he thought were moving cocaine through his Washington County borough.

Based on his belief that he was protecting two shipments totaling 14 kilograms of cocaine, federal sentencing guidelines recommended a sentence of 11 to 14 years in prison.

Assistant Federal Public Defender Marketa Sims argued that his sentence should be closer to three years because federal agents arbitrarily set the amount of “drugs” in the fictitious transactions.

U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti said she would have agreed with that argument if Solomon also hadn't commissioned a drive-by shooting on the vehicle owned by his ex-girlfriend's new boyfriend.

The hail of bullets could have injured or killed someone, and Solomon tried to commission a second shooting, the judge said.

“It's the type of conduct that would warrant the court to increase” the sentence, Conti said.

The man who pulled the trigger, Timothy D. Johnson, 42, of Washington pleaded guilty in October to 11 firearm charges and is serving a five-year prison sentence.

Solomon, who took $7,800 from the undercover agents to commit the crimes, apologized to the judge, prosecutors and his former colleagues.

“I would also like to apologize to my children,” the father of three said. “They are the ones I hurt the most.”

He asked the judge to recommend he be allowed to take theology and culinary classes while he's in prison and participate in the prison's ministry program.

Solomon, who remains free on bond until he starts his sentence, declined comment after the hearing.

Sims argued that Solomon deserved leniency for the more than three dozen years he spent working as both a police officer and a paramedic. It took a paid informant and the undercover agents a year to draw him into the string, she said.

“This is a man who, prior to being ensnared in this scheme, had done nothing but help people,” Sims said.

U.S. District Attorney David Hickton said afterward that the government had an airtight case and didn't ensnare Solomon.

“We don't identify public corruption targets,” he said. “They identify themselves.”

In particular, one of Solomon's most famous statements in the case — that he said he was the “best cop money could buy” — was an unsolicited remark he made to get the job protecting the drug transactions, Hickton said.

During the hearing, Hickton said that Solomon committed a string of crimes so that he could sell his office to people he thought were drug dealers.

The judge agreed, saying that while the amount of drugs was picked by the government, it doesn't change the fact that Solomon thought he was shielding cocaine shipments.

“He wanted to make money,” Conti said. “And if he could make money from selling his office, at least from the court's review of the record, he was happy to do it.”

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 orbbowling@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.