Braddock nonprofit says commuter shuttle has enough cash for one more week
Officials with a Monongahela Valley nonprofit said Tuesday they have enough money to extend free shuttle service to some area commuters by one week.
Braddock-based Heritage Community Initiatives had said its WorkLink service would end Sunday, the same day funding for the program dried up. Now officials say they have enough money — about $20,000 — to extend the program through July 6 while waiting for state leaders to pass a bill to preserve it for years to come.
WorkLink has received $860,000 a year in state and federal money through the Job Access and Reverse Commute, or JARC, program. About $20,000 remains from the last installment, Heritage spokeswoman Amy Schnarrenberger said.
“This gives our riders an opportunity to plan for one more week. But after that, without more funding, we're done,” Schnarrenberger said.
Established to provide residents from urban and low-income areas with access to suburban jobs, the federal government eliminated the JARC program last year.
The Senate passed a bill last month that includes $4 million to preserve WorkLink and seven other JARC programs across the state. The House is considering the measure.
WorkLink provides 13,000 rides a month to area commuters, connecting areas without transit service to existing Port Authority routes, said Sarah Morgan, Heritage's transportation manager.
Another local JARC program, the Airport Corridor Transportation Association's RideACTA, will discontinue service on Saturday as planned unless a funding deal is reached, Executive Director Lynn Manion said. It shuttles about 80,000 passengers a year between Port Authority's 28X Airport Flyer bus route to businesses in the Robinson area.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.