Share This Page

State Senate approves Medicaid expansion

| Sunday, June 30, 2013, 8:48 p.m.

HARRISBURG — The state Senate on Sunday approved a bill aimed at establishing conditions for Medicaid expansion in Pennsylvania under Obamacare.

Republican Gov. Tom Corbett has thus far resisted joining the federal program, but he has not made a final decision. An estimated 600,000 to 800,000 uninsured Pennsylvanians would receive health coverage under the program.

A summary of the Senate bill by the Public Health and Welfare Committee says the Department of Public Welfare will pursue an expansion of Medicaid Oct. 1.

The Senate passed the bill 40-10 with no debate, but it appears to be running into a roadblock in the House. Both chambers have Republican majorities.

House Health Committee Chairman Matthew Baker, R-Tioga County, said expanding Medicaid is “fiscally irresponsible and unsustainable,” despite federal promises of multi-billion dollar funding.

Numerous House Republicans said the federal government can't be trusted to keep its promises for long-range funding and that it would leave Pennsylvania taxpayers stuck with the bill.

The Senate Medicaid language is tucked into the bill authorizing expenditures in the Department of Public Welfare. The state budget, due by midnight Sunday night, would not be complete without the welfare code.

House Republicans seem unconcerned, suggesting there's a way to handle it.

Under the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, states must decide whether to expand Medicaid or not. About half of the states have indicated they will do so.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.