PennDOT says it will fund Amtrak's Pittsburgh-Harrisburg line
Pennsylvania will uphold a $3.8 million commitment to Amtrak to help keep passenger rail service running between Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, a PennDOT spokesman says.
It remains unknown how PennDOT will fulfill its promises to provide Port Authority with $30 million in emergency funding and $4 million to preserve eight transit programs across Pennsylvania that help low-income residents commute to suburban jobs.
A month and a half ago, state officials said a deal to save Amtrak's Pennsylvanian route hinged on legislators passing a plan to boost transportation funding. That effort fell apart Sunday as the House balked at a $2 billion funding proposal.
Gov. Tom Corbett said the issue could be revived in September.
“We're going to continue to honor that commitment to keep those services running. We're able to do that,” PennDOT spokesman Steve Chizmar said Tuesday of the Amtrak subsidy, which the railroad sought because a change in federal law requires it and state governments to share costs for routes up to 750 miles.
The Pennsylvanian runs between Pittsburgh and New York, providing the only passenger rail service between Western Pennsylvania and Harrisburg.
Spokeswoman Erin Waters-Trasatt said the money will come from a pot of about $20 million in uncommitted transit money.
Waters-Trasatt said PennDOT has not decided what to do with what will remain — about $16.4 million.
Port Authority received the $30 million in emergency money for the first time in the fiscal year that ended June 30 in exchange for worker concessions. Distributed in several installments throughout the year, it helped prevent service and job cuts.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lower Burrell man charged with shoplifting
- Linebacker Harrison coming along slowly since return to Steelers
- Ferrante trial: Cyanide order form in plain sight
- Red Wings rally, shock Penguins in overtime
- Steelers notebook: Shazier returns just in time
- Toyota Yaris adds French flair for ’15
- Pens look to buck shots, goals trend
- Fire at Flight 93 National Memorial hints at struggle to safeguard historic artifacts
- Ringgold has a ‘Berry’ good night
- Script is it: Classic Pitt helmet design to return
- Critics claim state Attorney General Kane puts politics first