Homewood man to stand trial on charges from police shootout
A man accused of critically injuring a Pittsburgh police officer in an April 11 shootout will stand trial on the charges.
James Robert Hill, 24, of Homewood waived his right to a preliminary hearing on Thursday in Pittsburgh Municipal Court, where city officers crowded the courtroom and lobby in a show of support for injured Officer Morgan Jenkins.
Prosecutors added an aggravated assault charge against Hill for injuring Officer Michelle Auge in the early morning encounter near Apple Avenue in Homewood.
Hill's arraignment on charges of attempted homicide, assaulting an officer, fleeing police, illegally having a gun and other crimes is scheduled for Aug. 27. He is being held at the Allegheny County Jail.Police said Hill fought with and fled from Jenkins and Auge and fired several shots, striking Jenkins once. The bullet hit Jenkins in the left arm and traveled into his chest, nicked his lung and stopped close to his spine, police said.
Police shot at Hill and struck him as many as five times.
Jenkins, who attended the hearing, uses a wheelchair.
“It's a traumatic incident,” said Sgt. Michael LaPorte, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge. No. 1. “When one of our own becomes a victim, we want to support him as much as we can.”
Hill's attorney, Milton Raiford, said he didn't think his client would benefit from a preliminary hearing.
“I don't think anything would've been gained by having the officers testify to something that was very horrific for them,” Raiford said.
Margaret Harding is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.