Share This Page

Fumo's children sue him for raiding $2.5 million trust

| Friday, July 12, 2013, 2:57 p.m.

PHILADELPHIA — A long-powerful Pennsylvania lawmaker is set to leave prison next month, but Vincent Fumo's children now accuse him of raiding their trust fund.

The 70-year-old Fumo netted more than $13 million from a family bank, and made millions more as a lawyer and senator. He's finishing a five-year prison term for stealing $4 million from the senate and two charities.

Fumo's assets are quickly dwindling, given millions spent on defense lawyers, restitution and back taxes.

Fumo's children had agreed to loan him $1.5 million from the $2.5 million trust. But in a lawsuit, they accuse Fumo of switching terms of the loan, and naming his fiance's brother-in-law to oversee the fund.

Vincent E. and Allison Fumo supported their father at his 2009 trial — but said in court this week they no longer trust him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.