Newtown shooting victim's mom, NRA argue for and against background checks in Pa.
HARRISBURG — The mother of a first-grader killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., told state lawmakers on Wednesday that expanding background checks on gun purchases won't eliminate gun crimes but would save lives.
A supporter of gun owners' rights maintained state background checks are ineffective, errors often happen, and the state doesn't need to conduct background checks because a federal system checks criminal records of potential gun purchasers.
Kim Stolfer of McDonald, chairman of Firearms Owners Against Crime, said background checks don't work. A bigger problem is judges turning people loose like they'd hit a winning number on a lottery ticket, he said.
Francine Lobus Wheeler, a Pennsylvania native who moved to Connecticut, urged members of the House Judiciary Committee to close the loophole that allows private sales of long guns, such as a rifle or shotgun, without background checks.
Still, doing so wouldn't have saved her son Ben, she said. The assault rifle used to kill him and 25 others in the school in December was purchased legally by the shooter's mother after a background check. The gunman, Adam Lanza, killed his mother before going to the school and killed himself after the rampage.
Since the murder, “I no longer have the fear to stand up and say what is right and what I believe,” said Wheeler, who grew up in Bucks County. “Ben gives me the courage to be here, to speak to legislators and to commit to change.”
Committee Chairman Ron Marsico, R-Dauphin County, billed the hearing as “educational” and not geared toward passing legislation. Marsico was noncommittal when asked whether the committee at some point would vote on a bill.
House Bill 1010 by Rep. Steven Santarsiero, D-Bucks, would require background checks for all firearms purchases.
Handgun sales, from licensed dealers or private sellers, require background checks. Shotgun or rifle purchases through licensed dealers require background checks.
The bill would ensure a background check for virtually every gun sale in Pennsylvania except transfers between close family members, said Shira Goodman, executive director of CeaseFirePA, a gun-control group.
“Background checks work,” Goodman said. Pennsylvania's system works well, she told the committee.
Although statistics show people use handguns to commit most gun crimes, a “significant portion” use long guns, she said. Since 2006, nine Pennsylvania police officers killed on duty were shot with long guns, she said.
Supporters of gun owners' rights disagreed.
Testimony submitted by the National Rifle Association cited statistics that rifles were used in 1.3 percent of murders and shotguns in fewer than 3 percent in 2011 in Pennsylvania. A much higher percentage of murders, 11.5 percent, were committed with non-firearm weapons, including “two-by-fours,” said the NRA's John Hohenwarter.
There is no evidence to show a significant percentage of murders are committed with rifles or shotguns acquired through lawful, private transactions, the NRA statement said.
Sixty percent of Pennsylvania murders involved handguns, Hohenwarter said.
Background checks for handgun purchases have not reduced the number of murders with handguns, the NRA contends. Likewise, extending the background check would be ineffective in reducing crime and place “burdensome restrictions” on law-abiding citizens, the organization argues.
Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers notebook: Roethlisberger says Saints game is ‘must win’
- Steelers’ backups Archer, Harris ready to run
- Comeau’s hat trick leads Penguins; Crosby reaches 800 career points
- Turkey Trot runners turn out to burn calories despite chilly Pittsburgh temps
- PIT wants non-passengers allowed past security to shop
- Cosby made deal with National Enquirer to spike accuser’s story in 2005
- Queen of crime writing P.D. James dies at 94
- Defying the odds makes this Thanksgiving particularly poignant
- Starkey: Rutherford will add when timing’s right
- Pitt plays best game of the season in rout of Kansas State
- Vanaski: Protesters won’t be thanking Wal-Mart