McCandless family doctor arrested, charged with possessing and distributing child porn
The Allegheny County District Attorney's Office arrested a McCandless family doctor at his home on Friday for possessing and distributing child pornography.
Dr. Mark Janosko, 47, a physician with West Penn Associates, was being held in the Allegheny County Jail pending his arraignment on two felony counts. No one answered the phone at Janosko's home Friday evening.
Investigators used computer software to trace multiple images of child pornography to Janosko's home, according to a criminal complaint.
Investigators and agents from the Western Pennsylvania Violent Crimes Against Children Task Force searched Janosko's home. They found thousands of sexually explicit images and videos of boys ages 5-14 on his computer.
Janosko told investigators that he viewed and downloaded child pornography “on and off for years,” explaining that he “felt that he can stop at anytime, and it is not uncontrollable.”
He told detectives that viewing child pornography has not interfered with his daily life, although he knew it was illegal.
Authorities notified the Allegheny Health Network of the charges. The network placed Janosko on a leave of absence pending the investigation, spokeswoman Jennifer Davis said.
“Allegheny Health Network will fully cooperate with law enforcement as they investigate this matter,” she said.
Mike Manko, a spokesman for the DA's office, said there is no evidence Janosko had any inappropriate contact with his younger patients. He asked concerned parents to call his office at 412-388-5300.
Janosko's preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 31 before McCandless District Judge William Wagner.
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.