Aliquippa contractor facing home improvement fraud charges
An Aliquippa contractor hired to build an addition onto a Crescent woman's home bilked her of $40,000 and failed to finish the project, the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office said Monday.
Charles E. Hawkins, 46, owner of C.E. Hawkins Construction, faces charges of theft and home improvement fraud. He was arraigned Friday before Coraopolis District Judge Mary Murray and released without bond. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 13.
Detectives with the district attorney's office said the victim signed a contract on May 2, 2012, in which Hawkins agreed to build the addition by late November for about $84,000. The victim wrote Hawkins checks totaling $40,000 over seven months, despite delays and periods when she could not reach Hawkins.
In the interim, Hawkins damaged the vinyl siding on the victim's shed and damaged her driveway with a backhoe, the complaint said.
In late March, the victim hired an attorney directing Hawkins to return to and finish the project and refund her $10,000, the complaint said. On May 21, Hawkins agreed to refund $10,000, but the victim couldn't get in touch with him.
In the meantime, the victim's floor was left exposed to the weather and became encrusted with black mold. The complaint said the floor must be removed and replaced before the project can proceed.
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.