Walmart charges too much sales tax on items purchased with coupons, Penn Hills man's lawsuit claims
Published: Monday, July 22, 2013, 4:24 p.m.
A Penn Hills man claims in a proposed class action lawsuit that Walmart Inc. charges too much sales tax on items purchased with coupons at its 131 Pennsylvania stores.
Lawyers for Brian Farneth originally filed the lawsuit in Allegheny County Common Pleas but lawyers for the retailer had it moved to federal court Monday because it crosses state lines.
Farneth bought two cans of shaving gel on June 8 with a buy-one-get-one-free coupon and noticed that the Walmart in O'Hara charges him sales tax on both cans, said one of his lawyers, Frank Salpietro.
“It is as simple as that,” he said.
State law requires the company to deduct the coupon amount before applying sales tax if the coupon information is included on the receipt, Salpietro said. Farneth is suing on behalf of anyone who has used a coupon to buy goods at Walmart since June 2007.
Thomas Allen, one of the lawyers representing Walmart, referred questions to the company.
“Walmart's current systems, with respect to the collection and remittance of sales tax, are in compliance with Pennsylvania's tax laws. We have previously sought an opinion from the state which confirmed this,” according to a prepared statement from Dan Fogleman, a company spokesman.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Host of Steelers veterans look toward career survival mode
- One dead in officer-involved shooting in Monroeville
- Steelers film session: Polamalu not at fault on long run
- McKeesport Festival of Trees raised holiday spirits of needy
- UPMC doctor killed trying to help at 50-vehicle pileup
- Pirates notebook: Huntington narrows team’s offseason targets
- McKeesport progressing toward resolution of suit
- Versailles moves to join enterprise zone
- Young defensemen lift Penguins to win
- Search continues for abductor
- Expert: KO doesn’t mean ‘worst’ concussion for Pens’ Orpik