ShareThis Page

Former worker charged with stealing $700K from healthcare nonprofit

| Tuesday, July 23, 2013, 5:24 p.m.

A former financial services manager for Allegheny Health Network spent most of the $713,000 he stole from the nonprofit at casinos to satisfy a gambling addiction, his attorney said Tuesday.

Ira L. Johnson, 52, of Penn Hills pleaded guilty to 12 charges stemming from two theft cases at Allegheny Health Network. He worked as a manager of patient financial services. Common Pleas Judge Phil Ignelzi is scheduled to sentence Johnson on Oct. 23.

“He had a gambling problem, and he's getting treatment for that,” said his attorney, Milton Raiford. “I think he's an ill person just as bad as any drug addiction. This is not the kind of guy you want to send to prison or jail. He's trying to work to pay it back.”

Prosecutors said Johnson funneled checks made out to Allegheny Medical Practice Network and West Penn Physician Practice Network into a PNC Bank business checking account that he opened on July 26, 2007.

Detectives said Johnson withdrew money — sometimes more than $10,000 at a time — at several casinos, including Rivers Casino on the North Shore, The Meadows Racetrack & Casino in North Strabane, Presque Isle Downs in Erie and Mountaineer Casino Racetrack & Resort in Newell, W.Va., according to the criminal complaint.

Johnson joined Allegheny Health Network in 2006 and was fired on Nov. 8, 2011. Allegheny Health Network executives met with detectives from the district attorney's office on Jan. 4, when an employee noticed suspicious activity. The company eventually conducted an internal audit, which uncovered missing money.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.