Superior Court denies state request to reargue Jordan Brown case
A Pennsylvania appeals court has rejected the state attorney general's request to reargue the case of a Lawrence County boy who was just 11 when he was charged in the shotgun killing of his father's pregnant fiancee and her unborn child in February 2009.
The Superior Court ruling means its May decision overturning the delinquency ruling in the case of Jordan Brown — who is now 15 — still stands. The state now has 30 days to appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
A three-judge Superior Court panel ruled last week was insufficient evidence for a Lawrence County judge to find Brown delinquent — the juvenile court equivalent of a guilty verdict — in the deaths of Kenzie Houk, 26, and her unborn son.
Brown remains in juvenile custody while the appeals continue.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: Brawl for ADs between Pitt and WVU
- Veteran tight end Miller’s blocking skill crucial to success to Steelers running game
- Fleury’s career-best 6th shutout lifts Penguins over Avalanche in overtime
- Icy roads, cold causing school delays, wrecks in Western Pa.
- Steelers must be creative in providing snaps for linebackers
- Analysis: Misunderstood Chryst served Pitt well
- Time is of essence for Pitt in finding football coach, athletic director
- Pitt offensive coordinator Rudolph still focused on Panthers
- With Pittsburgh charges, feds target Uganda-based counterfeiting ring
- Developer shows Buncher plans for 400 Strip District apartments, townhomes
- Beacons track shoppers’ smartphones amid retailers’ aisles