Judge rules in favor of former Monroeville police chief and officer in civil rights lawsuit
A federal judge on Monday ruled in favor of former Monroeville police Chief Doug Cole and Officer Edward Lewkowicz in a civil rights lawsuit brought by a former police officer.
Lawrence Storch, 45, of Monroeville claimed that Cole and Lewkowicz violated his civil rights by arresting and prosecuting him and, in Cole's case, by subsequently firing him for getting into a fight with his ex-wife.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ruled that Storch couldn't prevail on his claims against the municipality and the two officers because he pleaded no contest in November 2010 to a summary harassment charge. By law, the conviction shows Cole and Lewkowicz had probable cause for his arrest and prosecution, the judge ruled.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Two wild-card format hurting Pirates in short term
- Steelers trade 6th-round pick for Jaguars kicker Scobee
- Bryant suspension opens doors for other Steelers’ receivers
- Starkey: The kick returner and the grizzly bear
- Potential suspension of Pennsylvania AG’s license unusual
- Steelers WR Bryant’s suspension upheld
- Steelers notebook: LB Harrison believes Goodell will prevail in Brady ruling
- God is touchy topic in ICU, Pitt study finds
- Pitt defense is entering new season with something to prove
- Risks don’t get any better as online dating prospers
- Honored Westmoreland youth counselor sought in theft of money from clients