Share This Page

Employers add 162,000 jobs, rate falls to 7.4 percent

| Friday, Aug. 2, 2013, 8:42 a.m.
James Knox
Clarence Mason of Oak Hill sits in the Pennsylvania CareerLinks downtown offices Friday August 2, 2013 is looking for employment.

Gradual improvement in the nation's economy is not enough for Clarence Mason of the Hill District.

Jobs grew at a disappointing pace in July, the government said on Friday, adding just 162,000 jobs — far fewer than the 185,000 most economists had expected. Other elements of the Labor Department report were more encouraging.

The nation's unemployment rate fell 0.2 percentage points to a 4 12-year low of 7.4 percent last month. But the government report revised employment gains for May and June downward by 26,000 jobs.

“Right now, I'm getting desperate. I'm even applying for dishwasher jobs,” said Mason, 59, as he searched for work online at a career center Downtown.

“There are jobs out there, but I'm finding lesser-paying ones,” Mason said. He has been without work since losing his bookkeeping job at a South Side hotel in June.

“That plays into the take-away that this report leaves something to be desired,” said Mark Hamrick, an economic analyst at Bankrate.com in Washington. “At a time when we're praying for acceleration in the economy, we're just not getting that.”

For instance, the average employee's work week decreased in July, as did average hourly wages. That will slow consumer spending and signals lukewarm economic growth.

More encouraging was the number of unemployed people dropped by 263,000 last month to 11.5 million. Plus, the 7.4 percent jobless rate has not been at that low a level since December 2008.

“The general trend is in the right direction,” said Gus Faucher, senior economist at PNC Financial Services Group in Pittsburgh.

“Unemployment had peaked at 10 percent in October 2009. So it's fallen by 2.6 percentage points since then,” Faucher said.

The jobless rate for the seven-county Pittsburgh region stood at 6.8 percent in June, the latest data available, equaling the rate in March 2009. The June rate here compared with 6.9 percent in May and 7.2 percent in June 2012.

The national jobs report was not strong enough to lead the Federal Reserve to stop trying to stimulate more economic growth, Faucher said. The Fed has been buying $85 billion a month in securities to pump money into the economy and keep interest rates low.

“The July report reduces the likelihood the Fed will tighten (the money supply) in September, which most people had been expecting,” Faucher said.

Another reason the unemployment rate fell in July was a drop in the labor force. About 37,000 people last month decided not to actively look for a job. When people stop looking for work, they are no longer counted as part of the labor force, which artificially lowers the unemployment rate.

“That 37,000 is a relatively small number,” said Faucher. “But if it's repeated in August, it would be a bit more worrisome.”

Employment gains in July were led by 47,000 jobs added in retail and 38,000 jobs in food services and drinking places.

“Improvement in retail and bars and restaurants is fine for those people that want to work there, but these are not jobs you write home to brag about,” said Hamrick of Bankrate.com.

Manufacturing employment grew by a scant 6,000 last month, although it was the sector's first increase since February. Employment grew mainly because of strong gains in the auto industry, which in July posted their best sales in about four years.

The manufacturing sector has regained only 515,000 of the 2.29 million jobs lost during the Great Recession, according to the U.S. Business and Industry Council.

Employment in professional and business services increased by 36,000, said the labor report. Securities and investment jobs grew by 15,000.

Thomas Olson is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or at tolson@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.