Share This Page

25 Sandusky victims likely to settle claims this week, Penn State attorney says

| Monday, Aug. 19, 2013, 5:54 p.m.

STATE COLLEGE — Twenty-five men who say former Penn State University assistant coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused them will finalize settlement agreements with the university this week, a negotiator said Monday.

Michael Rozen, a New York-based attorney Penn State retained to mediate the settlement discussions, said 25 of 31 claims against Penn State should be finalized, barring unexpected developments.

In addition to those claims, one claim entered litigation, one will file a lawsuit “shortly,” one claimant continues discussions and three are considered “not reliable,” according to Rozen.

A 25-year-old man identified during Sandusky's trial as Victim 5 was the first to finalize a settlement with the university, according to his Philadelphia-based attorney Tom Kline. Victim 5 testified that he was groped in a university shower in August 2001 by the former defensive coordinator.

Kline declined to comment on the dollar amount but said that as part of the deal, his client gave up the right to sue any other party, including The Second Mile, the charity Sandusky founded to serve underprivileged children.

Both Kline and Rozen said the settlement process was relatively speedy, taking about a year in most cases. The lead negotiator added that Penn State conducted itself appropriately and professionally while discussing deals with more than 30 claimants.

The university positioned itself to recover money from The Second Mile and its insurers, Kline said. In addition to seeking to recover money from the charity, Penn State sued its insurance company, the Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co., over its refusal to cover the claims.

A university spokesman declined to comment on the settlements, saying, “The university continues to make progress on multiple settlements.” University trustee Ted Brown said in July that the governing board authorized about $60 million in total payouts to the 25 Sandusky accusers.

State College-based attorney Andrew Shubin, who represents seven men who said Sandusky abused them, said Monday that negotiators are in the “final stages” of resolving claims he presented to the university, and said he and his clients expect to finish within the week.

Shubin represents four men who testified against Sandusky during his criminal trial, in addition to the victim identified in court documents only as Victim 2— the boy Sandusky assaulted in a campus shower, according to testimony by former assistant Mike McQueary.

Shubin also represents Matt Sandusky, Jerry Sandusky's adopted son who recently filed in Centre County Court for a name change.

“There is no amount of money that will give them back their childhood or that can make them feel whole,” Shubin said. “However, this is one step in the right direction and hopefully it will give them continued traction in their recovery.”

A Centre County jury found Sandusky, 69, guilty of molesting 10 boys during more than a decade. He is serving a 30- to 60-year prison sentence at a State Correctional Facility in Waynesburg.

Three Penn State administrators accused of covering up the abuse are set to go to trial, although a date is not set. Retired vice president Gary Schultz, former athletic director Tim Curley and ex-President Graham Spanier all are charged with perjury, conspiracy and failure to report suspected abuse.

Anna Orso is a freelance writer based in State College.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.