Monroeville man Pavinich charged with stealing $425,000 from widowed mother
A Monroeville man is free on a recognizance bond to await a hearing on charges of misappropriating more than $425,000 from his widowed mother for his benefit.
Mark D. Pavinich, 52, has an Aug. 27 hearing on charges of theft, access device fraud and related crimes. He's accused of taking $425,249 from his 77-year-old mother, Virginia Pavinich.
He could not be reached for comment.
The woman told investigators with the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office that she gave her son power of attorney in February 2007, designating him to act as her agent in case she became incompetent. She said she and her husband of almost 50 years, Anthony Pavinich, jointly owned several pieces of property until his death in September 2008.
Anthony Pavinich was experiencing dementia and in declining health when he and Virginia Pavinich went with their son to set up an irrevocable trust for their money and property in June 2008, a criminal complaint states.
Virginia Pavinich believed the trust designated her the beneficiary and told investigators she was stunned to learn that all her properties no longer were in her name but belonged to the trust.
The attorney who set up the trust told investigators he repeatedly warned Mark Pavinich that he was a fiduciary with the responsibility of managing the money and that the cash was not his to spend.
Virginia Pavinich told investigators her son has been liquidating her assets and isolating her from her finances. She accused him of threatening to institutionalize her if she did not go along with his plans.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.