Motions filed to dismiss lawsuit from professor claiming permanent hearing loss after G-20 summit
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Aug. 19, 2013, 6:03 p.m.
Lawyers for a visiting English professor and the city on Monday filed a joint motion to dismiss a lawsuit connected to the September 2009 Group of 20 economic summit in Pittsburgh.
The city agreed last November to pay Karen Piper of the University of Missouri $72,000 for the permanent hearing loss she suffered when police used a highly focused loudspeaker to disperse a crowd.
Vic Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, said the final dismissal of the case was delayed by an agreement that Piper's lawyers would bring in a consultant to review the draft of a policy on how and when police will deploy the Long Range Acoustic Device.
The settlement doesn't require the city to adopt the policy, but the consultation happened last week, allowing both sides to file the motion to dismiss, he said.
Paul Krepps, one of the lawyers representing the city, said the actual consultation lasted a few hours, but it took months to set up because of scheduling conflicts between all of the people involved.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Los Angeles gangsters on Syria’s battlefield a rarity, experts assure
- Kovacevic: Big Ben’s contract clock ticking
- Talented center Sutter is proving to be ‘pretty important’ for Penguins
- 40 kids to go to camp for free
- Grand welcomes ‘Cinderella’
- Pitt looking to enhance profile at ACC tourney
- Pirates reserve outfielder Dickerson is also at home on soccer pitch
- Robert Morris University Polling Institute poll finds value of college in doubt
- Western Pennsylvania engineer aboard missing Malaysia Airlines flight
- Democratic governor candidate Wagner remains confident amid skepticism
- Parking tickets in Downtown Pittsburgh spark outrage