TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Motions filed to dismiss lawsuit from professor claiming permanent hearing loss after G-20 summit

Daily Photo Galleries

Monday, Aug. 19, 2013, 6:03 p.m.
 

Lawyers for a visiting English professor and the city on Monday filed a joint motion to dismiss a lawsuit connected to the September 2009 Group of 20 economic summit in Pittsburgh.

The city agreed last November to pay Karen Piper of the University of Missouri $72,000 for the permanent hearing loss she suffered when police used a highly focused loudspeaker to disperse a crowd.

Vic Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, said the final dismissal of the case was delayed by an agreement that Piper's lawyers would bring in a consultant to review the draft of a policy on how and when police will deploy the Long Range Acoustic Device.

The settlement doesn't require the city to adopt the policy, but the consultation happened last week, allowing both sides to file the motion to dismiss, he said.

Paul Krepps, one of the lawyers representing the city, said the actual consultation lasted a few hours, but it took months to set up because of scheduling conflicts between all of the people involved.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Lure of tuition aid, gifts draw college students to ‘sugar daddy’ sites
  2. Starkey: Rinaldo doesn’t belong in NHL
  3. Crosby, Malkin dazzle fellow All-Stars
  4. Woman killed in Washington Township crash
  5. Long-term solution for wastewater disposal eludes shale gas industry
  6. Tough times are in past for Pitt senior guard Kiesel
  7. Former athletes open businesses
  8. Suburban Catholic schools grow in Western Pennsylvania
  9. Power 5 conferences’ paying cost of attendance worries schools large and small
  10. ‘Line is definitely blurry,’ state police say of dating websites and prostitution
  11. State’s no-bid contracts with private law firms prompt scrutiny