TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Judge gives Highmark, UPMC a week to file notices regarding settlement agreement

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Aug. 20, 2013, 2:36 p.m.
 

U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti on Tuesday gave Highmark Inc. and UPMC a week to each file a notice as to who they believe has the authority to enforce a settlement agreement brokered by Gov. Tom Corbett.

UPMC wants Conti to order Highmark to drop the antitrust lawsuit West Penn Allegheny Health System filed in 2009 before Highmark bought West Penn Allegheny. But it also contends that Conti can't order UPMC to drop a 2012 antitrust lawsuit against West Penn Allegheny and Highmark because UPMC filed it after Corbett brokered the agreement in May 2012.

Highmark contends that Conti can't order it to drop the 2009 lawsuit because it's not a plaintiff in the lawsuit and West Penn Allegheny isn't a party to the settlement agreement. It also contends that UPMC can't sue it for breaching the agreement until UPMC lives up to its half of the bargain by dropping the 2012 lawsuit.

Conti's order gives both sides until Aug. 27 to identify “the court or governing body” that can order them to carry out the settlement's terms.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. With Malkin out, Penguins fall to Flyers, 4-1
  2. Former Plum teacher says he warned district about possible inappropriate conduct
  3. Authorities release name of Greensburg man who jumped off overpass onto Route 30
  4. Pirates notebook: Richard doesn’t exercise opt-out clause in contract
  5. Pirates’ McCutchen leaves game early, says he is not hurt
  6. Pirates planning on maximizing the versatility of Rodriguez
  7. Steelers re-sign DE Geathers
  8. Jefferson Hospital flag-raising kicks off Donate Life Month
  9. Jeannette teen ordered to stand trial in classmate’s slaying
  10. Reliever Hughes takes plenty of pride in being Pirates’ middle man
  11. Wines claimed to be toxic with arsenic won’t be pulled by state Liquor Control Board