Search continues for Latrobe bank robber, accomplice
The search continued on Saturday for the man who robbed the Citizens Bank branch office in Latrobe on Friday, and his accomplice who drove the getaway car, police said.
Latrobe Det. John Sleasman said they have not yet identified the man who robbed the bank at 2841 Ligonier St., at about 11 a.m. The robber, who fled with a bag of money, was described as a white male, wearing a black and gold zip-up jacket.
No one was injured in the robbery at the bank, at Ligonier Street and Route 982.
The money inside the bag was destroyed by a dye pack that exploded when the robber left the bank, Sleasman said. The robber was holding the bag close to his chest when it exploded and the intensity of that explosion would have caused some burning or welts on his chest, Sleasman said. The dust from the explosion would have caused a severe irritation to his eyes, Sleasman said.
The robber left in a getaway car that police described as being a black four-door older model sedan. A witness said they believed that the car, which might have been a BMW or European model, drove in a southerly direction on Route 982 toward Route 30, Sleasman said.
Anyone with information about the suspects is asked to call Westmoreland 911.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins forwards struggle in loss to Avalanche
- Starkey: In defense of Mel Kiper Jr.
- Agent: Polamalu undecided whether to play in 2015
- Wolf’s Pa. budget plan seen as having almost no chance
- Mt. Lebanon deer-culling corrals sprayed with urine, repellant
- Angry fans cited in shortage of refs in Western Pennsylvania
- Dermatologist led UPMC residency program
- Ice jam wipes out McKeesport’s marina
- Pirates look to put more pressure on opposition with better baserunning
- Miami’s 67-63 victory further damages Pitt’s NCAA Tourney hopes
- Supreme Court split on Obamacare subsidies