Share This Page

Grove City College president to retire at end of academic year

| Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, 4:09 p.m.

Grove City College President Richard G. Jewell will retire from his post at the end of the academic year.

Jewell, 68, a lawyer and Pittsburgh businessman, was named president of Grove City in 2003. The 1967 graduate of the college on Tuesday announced his plans to retire at the school's 138th convocation.

“It is time to pass the baton to the next leader and for me to move on from this place that I love, knowing that together we have made a difference in the lives of our students and graduates,” Jewell said.

Before assuming the presidency of the private liberal arts school 70 miles north of Pittsburgh, Jewell was a director of Navigant Consulting Inc., a large forensic accounting firm.

He previously served as executive vice president of the University of Pittsburgh Trust, the holding entity for five of the university's applied research companies. He was a member of the university's senior management council and president of Pittsburgh Applied Research Corp., the for-profit operating company of the University of Pittsburgh Applied Research Center in Harmarville.

During Jewell's tenure at Grove City, the college added several major buildings to its 174-acre campus and increased enrollment by 10 percent, officials said.

A Grove City spokeswoman said Jewell and his wife, Dayl, plan to return to their home in Bethel Park. They had been living in Grove City.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.