Woman waited too long to sue over ex-Pittsburgh cop's sexual coercion, judge rules
A Knoxville woman who alerted Pittsburgh police in 2008 that an officer threatened her if she didn't perform a sex act waited too long to sue the city and its former police chief over claims they failed to properly train and deal with the officer, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge Mark R. Hornak dismissed the woman's claims against the city and former Chief Nate Harper based on the city's arguments that a two-year statute of limitations expired. The woman said she alerted officials in 2008 of then-Officer Adam Skweres' behavior. She sued in March, after an Allegheny County judge sentenced Skweres to up to eight years in prison for sexually coercing several women while on duty.
The Tribune-Review does not identify accusers in sexual crimes. Hornak allowed the woman's legal claims against Skweres to continue. Her attorneys could not be reached for comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Would one big move kill Pirates’ future?
- Steelers offensive linemen looking to build on strong 2013 finish
- Heyl: This dress is a steal
- Pirates inquire about Red Sox LHP Lester
- GNC revenue, sales drop, but vitamin retailer says plan in place
- Penn Township man seeking gun permit accused of bringing heroin to courthouse
- Attorney had broad range of private, public clients
- Peduto offers ray of light to understaffed Pittsburgh building bureau
- 3 men to stand trial over runaway Latrobe foster children
- Giant Eagle provides assistance to fight proposed Wal-Mart in McCandless
- Newsmaker: Brian Stein